<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Amazon Kindle, Sony Reader and Iliad on Twin Cities Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ebookreader-review.com/amazon-kindle/the-amazon-kindle-sony-reader-and-iliad-on-twin-cities-live/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ebookreader-review.com/amazon-kindle/the-amazon-kindle-sony-reader-and-iliad-on-twin-cities-live</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWriterWandering</title>
		<link>http://www.ebookreader-review.com/amazon-kindle/the-amazon-kindle-sony-reader-and-iliad-on-twin-cities-live#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>AWriterWandering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebookreader-review.com/amazon-kindle/the-amazon-kindle-sony-reader-and-iliad-on-twin-cities-live#comment-766</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Plastic cups ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Plastic cups consume more resources to make than paper cups. However the former is considered more environmentally friendly because it only takes a small amount of energy to clean and reuse.

It&#039;s the same idea here. The ebook consumes more resources initially, however the maintenance is low. Especially since the eInk uses very little power compared to other display technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Plastic cups &#8230;</b> <br /> Plastic cups consume more resources to make than paper cups. However the former is considered more environmentally friendly because it only takes a small amount of energy to clean and reuse.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same idea here. The ebook consumes more resources initially, however the maintenance is low. Especially since the eInk uses very little power compared to other display technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhaelter</title>
		<link>http://www.ebookreader-review.com/amazon-kindle/the-amazon-kindle-sony-reader-and-iliad-on-twin-cities-live#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>jhaelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebookreader-review.com/amazon-kindle/the-amazon-kindle-sony-reader-and-iliad-on-twin-cities-live#comment-767</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;uhu why buy a ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; uhu why buy a kindle for like 299 or 399 or whatever! it&#039;s expensive. and a book is enviorement unfriendly, like if. come on! electric devices are so more unfriendly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>uhu why buy a &#8230;</b> <br /> uhu why buy a kindle for like 299 or 399 or whatever! it&#8217;s expensive. and a book is enviorement unfriendly, like if. come on! electric devices are so more unfriendly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

